Scrum is mostly micromanaged, promoted or marketed in a way that confused young developers or engineers who might take it as a good thing – its all about micro management, almost every method or process of Scrum is there to back micromanagement. The daily scrum is about micro-managing the teams day-to-day work and its plans and ensuring that every team member is doing the tasks which they are told to work upon.
Scrum Master Certification Online is being continued in SarvaShikshan e-Learning, to capture the entire potential candidates across the world irrespective of their geographical location.
Continuous integration is part of the cycle so that minute some developer goofs up and breaks a build or product development cycle, it becomes known. Concept of pair programming is used in Scrum methodology. To make sure that developers or programmers don’t lose focus, don’t work on any other stuff other than what is allocated etc.
One thing to notice about micromanagement is…who is doing this micromanagement? It’s the team itself, yes Scrum is about micromanagement, but its about the team micromanaging themselves and for their own benefit. Scrum Master Certification Online batches are conducted.
There are various perceptions about micromanagement in Scrum, some people don’t want to work in an environment where he or she is being monitored on a continuous and daily basis. They feel they are professional enough to see a project through to delivery and want to be treated like a matured adult rather than a child or a criminal. This being the general attitude of experienced / capable engineers and developers.
Scrum is being marketed based on a false division that it is an alternative to “Waterfall” – if we are into business driven engineering or development then this division might exist. You either need a inflexible and rigid process of big design up-front, and 3 to 4 hour meetings about small, precise, trivial details of database schemas, or you need this random and military like short term…given the name of ‘Scrum’ complete with user-stories, and scrums which is work pre-digested into 2 weeks sprints or cycles or iterations. In general though the false division is non-existent. Scrum Master Certification Online Training for all candidates to take training conveniently from their home.
For a small start-up who is fighting to establish itself, needs to motivate talented workforce to take on the full scope of work quality and to deliver quickly..Scrum is considered OK – for every other type of organization its considered broken. It may not account for the career needs of engineers or developers or programmers, and that is something that a good manager has to consciously keep in mind when allocating work to his team members. It is of utmost importance that the organization helps individuals grow along the path of the organizational growth and giving promotions and designation changes to people of right attitude, mindset and performance. Sometimes this methodology does not give the engineers or developers the ability to define or direct their own work in a meaningful way and this causes repulsion especially in senior talent.
The main problem with Scrum is that it’s an effort to bridge a gap between business-driven and closed co-ordination software development – as mentioned earlier that it works ok for small start-ups and small consulting firms or organizations, that are struggling to establish themselves and not yet capable enough to be choosy about what work they take on, because an organization in that scenario cannot do open allocation and it does not have a solution to the short term quick changes from client side. In this scenario ‘sprints’ do a good job of time bound projects and making engineers or developers assigned on undesirable projects feel better, because they are aware that they will be rotated off to other projects of their liking and which are desirable from their individual and career perspective and growth. Scrum Master Certification Online is the way forward in today’s uncertain world where COVID-19 and its variants are still existing.
I guess an important element in answering this question is all about change in people’s perceptions or way to look at it which Scrum requires….
- From a customer’s perspective –
- Customers will have to try and avoid the urge to add a feature or a change during an iteration since each sprint will be based on a fixed set of features to be developed.
- With customer in the Product Owner role, which is the most common norm in an Scrum methodology, there is the expectation of more involvement – both in terms of decision making and product reviews, compared to the client role in a traditional waterfall projects.
- In most of the Scrum projects only the timelines are fixed and frozen, functionality is ever changing and is flexible.
- Since Scrum is an iterative process, customers will get to see and test product or project increments on an ongoing basis. In most cases these increments are far from the finished product (particularly UI).
- From a development team’s perspective –
- Teams are expected to function cross-disciplined and self-organizing units – where designers, developers and testers often working in parallel.
- With daily stand-up meetings, burn down charts and scrum boards there is a very good visibility on the progress of the project and who is working on what.
- Teams generally work in short-term sprints, which can be rigorous and typically start with a central sprint planning meeting and end with sprint review meeting in which working software or product is demoed to the customer or stakeholder.
With Scrum it is important to not get too retarded by its methodology, process side of things, after all Scrum itself is a flexible and evolving methodology.
Instead for Scrum to be successful, it is important to customize the principles that undermine Scrum in such a way that they will work for the project, the developers or engineers and the product owner or stakeholder in question.